Should I Lose Weight? Part 1: Beauty


I’ve been in the fitness industry for 15 years, and over the years there’s become more and more I dislike about it. I think what I dislike the most is the obsession with our physical form. It’s not a fitness industry. It’s a fatness industry. And it’s falsehoods are killing us.

Greg Crister, Harper’s Magazine, wrote about our culture, “No one, and I mean NO ONE, in the pages of the glossy magazines within which the elite project their image of themselves is anything like fat. The hierarchy of acceptable body types is becoming more rigid and exclusive than ever before.”

And within ALL of the thousands of “beautiful” images are hidden some rather ugly statistics.

Women and Children, first:
-Up to 97% of women report, at some point, “HATING” their own body.
-47% of girls in 5th-12th grade reported wanting to lose weight because of magazine pictures.
-69% of girls in 5th-12th grade reported that magazine pictures influenced their idea of a perfect body shape
-42% of 1st-3rd grade girls want to be thinner
-81% of 10 year olds are afraid of being fat
-The average dieting age for girls is 8 years old

“The muscularity of ideal male body representations present an extremely, and largely unattainable, muscular ideal male body type, which is equivalent to the unattainable thin female ideal” (Lever, Frederick, & Peplau, 2006; Schooler & Ward, 2006) (Olivardia, Pope, Borowiecki, & Cohane, 2004)
-Inadequacy in males often leads to abnormal eating and substance abuse

In total…
The U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported Americans spent approximately $30 billion in 1992 on all types of diet programs and products. Marketdata estimated in its 2007 study the size of the U.S. weight loss market at $55 billion. It is now estimated to have reached over $60 Billion.

There are well over 100 million people “dieting” every single day in the United States. And 35% of those “occasional dieters” progress into pathological dieting (disordered eating), and as many as 25%, advance to full-blown eating disorders, reports the Philadelphia Eating Disorder Examiner. And eating disordered individuals have the highest rate of mortality of all mental disorders.

Anywhere from 65 – 98% of dieters return to their pre-dieting weight within three years, according to Gary Foster, Ph.D., clinical director of the Weight and Eating Disorders Program at the University of Pennsylvania, and Rudolph L. Leibel M.D. of Columbia University Medical Center.

Wherever the actual percentage of failing dieters falls, the majority of people are never going to see the projected expectation of physical beauty expressed by their body. According to The Renfrew Center Foundation for Eating Disorders, It’s estimated that the body type portrayed in advertising as the ideal is possessed naturally by only 5% of American females.

Even though the odds of almost anyone radically altering their weight indefinitely are dismal, it is still possible. But at what cost? If we don’t want to embrace the unique beauty of the Individual, the majority will continue to find themselves devastated by the physical, psychological, and emotional destruction of believing that all of us should fit into 5%.

Roberta Pollack Seid in her book, Never Too Thin, Why Women Are At War With Their Bodies, concludes “We pursue thinness with a fervor that borders on the religious. We believe in physical perfectibility and see its pursuit as a moral obligation. The virtue that presumably will put us on this road is our ability to control one of our most fundamental instincts – eating. We have come to believe thinner is healthier, happier, and more beautiful as though it were handed down on Mount Sinai. But those are not divine truths. They are prejudices with a complex history. They have led to a false religion that does not deliver what it promises.

Seid continued, “…Never before have so many people believed that the shape of their lives depended on the shape of their bodies.” But their measurements, their weight, are a matter of health,.. Right? Is weight a useful predictor of health?

The answers may surprise you…
Stay Tuned for Part 2

*Note – statistics cited from National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Disorders, University of Colorado, and National Eating Disorders Association

Two Questions That Forever Changed How I Eat


I used to pride myself as being a very “healthy” eater: limited foods, from even more limited sources, as “whole” as possible, always. I didn’t think of it as restrictive. It was “clean.” I believed in only eating “natural, real food.” My way of eating was more than about being healthy, it was moral…or so I thought.

I campaigned fervently for my righteous way of eating. I taught “real food nutrition” at every opportunity, to anyone I met. I changed the way A LOT of people thought about food, and how they constructed their diet. And A LOT of people’s health changed for the better. I was validated…for a while.

The results didn’t always last. Not only were my results waning, but so were others. I was seeing more people that weren’t instantly cured by giving up “unhealthy, processed” foods. And I even encountered people who were getting worse upon eating the “good, whole, real” foods. I could not imagine what was so inherently wrong with these people that the “healthy” foods were not working, and even making them sick!

Until one day, while ruminating about others food indecency and their perplexingly positive results, I had a thought that would change my life. I very quietly, and dubiously, asked myself one question, “What if… just, what if… I was… (clears throat, swallows)… wrong?” Was it possible that it was my beliefs, and not their bodies, that were wrong?

Do we, as a collective scientific community, know everything? Uhhh, No. There is a genetics professor at UT Austin that says at the beginning of each new semester, “Everything I taught 10 years ago is complete nonsense today. And everything I teach today will be complete nonsense in 10 years.”

Our model of every thing is limited and incomplete. We are constantly learning new things, with new pieces, from new technological breakthroughs.  What good is the scientific process if we are not willing to change our perspective when given new pieces to the puzzle?

Stephen Hawking, world renowned theoretical physicist, states in A Brief History of Time, “you can disprove a theory by finding even a single observation that disagrees with the predictions of the theory…” One outlying, seemingly contradictory experience changes EVERYTHING, and I had witnessed a lot.

Hawking concludes with, “Each time new experiments are observed to agree with the predictions the theory survives, and our confidence in it is increased; but if ever a new observation is found to disagree, we have to abandon or modify the theory.

My confidence in my dietary beliefs was crumbling beneath me. And then my long held beliefs about diet and nutrition were revolutionized with 2 simple questions:

“Have I ever had a good outcome/positive response with any declared “unhealthy” food?”

“Have I ever had a bad outcome/negative response to “healthy” food?”

Answering yes meant my model of a healthy diet was wrong. And that was hard for me. But changing, despite my experiences, seemed harder.

Deane Juhan in his book,Job’s Body, eloquently states my struggle,
“…Unfortunately, if the history of mankind, or even of modern science, has any lasting certainty to offer us, it is the fact that it is entirely possible for rational individuals to be absolutely certain about notions that later prove to be utterly preposterous… We must escape our pain, quiet our fears, and we must act, today, now. For this reason we are always tempted to adopt beliefs and to defend them staunchly as truths, because the possibilities which they imply profoundly soothe our anxieties and produce some measure of practical results, rather than because their actualities have been borne out by unequivocal proofs or continue to offer the very best solution to current problems.”

The problems that had occurred from defending, adhering, and negatively adapting to my old beliefs were far worse, for myself and everyone I interacted with, than the momentary pain and anxiety of adopting the new. In fact it was that temporarily uncomfortable space that led me to the realization that our diet has never been, nor will ever be, perfect. That’s NEVER been biology’s goal. But it could be better. It was time for a new model.

With all that I currently know, I believe a healthier diet model includes these three important distinctions:

Dietary Distinction 1: Individual
We are all different, and we should respect one another’s dietary reflection of that.
Does your diet reflect yours?

Dietary Distinction 2: Inclusive
A healthier diet includes ALL of the foods that have EVER elicited a personally positive response. Has Yours?

Dietary Distinction 3: Increasing
Biology’s greatest offering is the possibility of ever increasing one’s functional capacity. A healthier diet model seeks, at every opportunity, to increase the range of foods from all sources that makes one feel good and function better. Does yours?

So now the questions turn to you:
Have you ever had a positive response to a “negative” food?
Have you ever had a negative response to a “positive” food?

My résponses to these questions forever changed my diet which leads to my last question:
How will your response to food change your relationship to food…how will you change your diet?



I am a TRENDY guy… dietarily speaking.

When it comes to feeding, eating and dieting, I have done it all. At least I have tried. I started 18 years ago as a strict calorie counter and a low calorie consumer. I have been fat free, and also full fat, all fat. I have eaten low carb, no carb ketogenic. I’ve carbed with no bread, no grains, as well as hi carb, and heavy grains. I have gone paleo, in all of its forms. I was metabolically “typed” and a metabolic typing advisor. I have been vegetarian, vegan, and as carnivorous as Vihjalmur Stefannson.  I have strictly used conventional or all organic and biodynamic foods, like the local co-op and grocery store I founded. I have been gluten free, soy free, dairy free, and additive free. I have soaked, sprouted, and fermented. I have not only exclusively used whole foods but highly processed and refined,too. I have supplemented and superfooded, cleansed, detoxed, fasted, and I have feasted. When it comes to food, the only thing I have more of than food knowledge is varied dietary experience.

I was constantly searching for the perfect way of eating. It had to be there. I would seek and sample ’til I found it. For many years, moving onto a new dietary trend meant new hope, with an eerily optimistic belief that all variables of food chemistry and human biology had been, and could be, accounted for with this new trend. “Ahh, Yes. Of Course!” I THOUGHT to myself. As if this time dietary optimization was at hand. It also meant bashing the old belief, and belittling anyone who still advocated for any of the aforementioned antiquated ways of eating. The sad truth about this brazenly biased way of thinking, I missed the most important thing, my response.

I was far more interested in arguments than outcomes. I wasn’t a scientist. I was a philosopher at best, and a pedantic pundit at worst. But that could change any time I wanted because unbeknownst to me I had been running experiments this whole time. Simply by eating and noting my responses I had far more useful evidence than I could ever acquire through reading and research.

Before running anymore experiments, I needed to look at the results of my dietary endeavors: ALL of them. To the best of my ability, I put my beliefs and ALL that I had “learned” on the back burner and looked simply at the outcomes. I was startled, to say the least, about what I found.

What I found was not an exclusive way of eating, but an inclusive one. With each diet practice, I had positive results, to some degree. I had done well with whole foods, but also with processed and refined. I had done great with organics, but also with conventional. I had good experiences as a vegetarian, and just as good as a meat eater. I had done well with low fat, low carb, and low calories, and I had other great outcomes from hi fat, hi carb, and astronomic caloric consumption.

The greatest association I found with food and my health, was that the more foods I was willing to include in my diet, the better my health. I just had to pay attention to what I was feeling, and be ok to eat what was necessary.

Every diet has something in common. It defines good and bad. According to EVERY diet there are good foods, and there are bad foods. And we believe it, every time. And we act accordingly. Until that inevitable moment that we sway from our diet, or give it up altogether. We abandon the “good” for the “bad”. And for some time after, we feel better, much better. Why?

Because there is no such thing as inherently good or bad foods. There are just better contexts, for each person, to eat a particular food, or eat in a particular way. And it is going to be different for EVERYONE.

I still consider myself a trendy guy,.. dietarily speaking. But instead of following diet trends, I follow my body’s. My body provides me with all of the direction I could ever need.
Biofeedback based eating is sensitive and responsive to all of our body’s trends. And I believe it’s the only way of eating that will always work. The only requirement is to let your body, not your mind, be the guide.


One of My Mentors, Part 2

If you haven’t read Part 1,
do so now and then come back!

How is it that someone who most people
(especially exercise physiologists)
would think is so healthy could end up so broken
both musculoskeletally and chemically?

Most of those same people may look at his output
and think that he’s just mechanically and chemically worn out
the victim of auto-overuse…
but I have an alternative hypothesis.

When you look at the films of his arthritic hips,
you might expect the inflammation to be in the areas of “overuse”
but that isn’t exactly how the body works.

A folksy way of describing one of the adaptive properties of the body is,
“Use it or lose it.”

With this in mind,
it won’t come as a surprise that my mentor’s hips
were healthy…at least through the Ranges of Motion he used.
It was in those ways that he didn’t move where the joint was arthritic.

There are more and more studies are pointing towards health being measured based off of variability, flexibility, or more specifically – adaptability.

There is a danger to doing the same things over and over and over again. The trench, the groove that is dug in the body (including the mind) is so deep it becomes damn near impossible to jump the track, to deviate, to change directions.

For those of us who move a lot, especially in a limited set of directions, my mentor offers us a cautionary tale, move in all directions or ultimately lose all directions.

But what lost him, what cost him all his directions was a very specific part of his body, his mind. His mind moved a lot, too…in a few directions. He was very educated, very academically minded. But he missed it long enough for it to become a serious problem. What he knew got in the way of what he didn’t know.

There is a very simple way to avoid his fate.
Move what’s not moving.
Learn so that you may unlearn.

(Are you ready to learn what you don’t know and move what you’re not moving? Pick up GYM MOVEMENT today!)

Snack for Sleep


You cannot sleep. You’re wired but oh so tired, wide awake. It’s probably close to the hours of 2am – 4am. Not only is this a  physiologically classic time to find yourself sleepless, but it’s frustrating and very anxiety producing. You’re quite possibly on the precipice of a total emotional breakdown.

I’m sorry. I know you’re TIRED! I’ve been through it too. But I am here to tell you, that there’s hope!

Why am I awake?
We could discuss neurology, sleep phases and durations of beta, alpha, theta, and delta brain waves, but how’s that going to get you to sleep, NOW! We could look at the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the pineal gland, or the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, but other than making me sound smart, how does that get you to SLEEP? Let’s keep it simple. Generally speaking, You are distressed. Why? I don’t know. I am not you. Maybe something you didn’t finish that day, or something you have pending tomorrow, or maybe you’re just in the middle of some existential crisis. Regardless, you’re distressed. Just not getting sleep is distressful. “OK. So I am ‘distressed.’ How does that knowledge help me, and not add to my worry?”

Is there anything I can do?
Our body’s chemical distress response activates systems in the body that are alerting and adrenaline pumping, not sleep inducing. You need to shut down that chemical alerting and excitation. And there is one easy way to do so…food, specifically carbohydrates: sugar, starch or both, that’s up to you. Salt and fat are great accessories. Let’s be real, when you’re totally distressed or up on a sleepless night, you’re not thinking how you can get your hands on raw celery sticks and mineral water. You want chips, candy, and ice cream…intravenously, NOW! That’s not emotional. That’s physiological. “But, but.. BUT!”

Won’t I get fat?
No, it’s not going to make you fat. In fact, quite the opposite. Sleep is one of the best lean-producing, fat reducing, anti-aging activities our bodies can engage. When you go sleepless, you significantly lower metabolic rate, your appetite activating and suppressing hormones, ghrelin, leptin and insulin are deranged, and that all-day tired is practically chronically activating that chemical distress response, over and over, which exacerbates all of the above (and A LOT MORE), and of course requires even more food to suppress it. In other words, snack yourself to sleep, if you can, or you will rapidly age your depressingly, fattening, sick and over-tired body.

What sounds a lot like, nice. dream? Ice. Cream.
I could go on, but suffice it to say, a carb-y, salty, fatty snack, in the middle of the night, when you need it, will be much more stimulating to weight control, leanness, anti-aging, health, vitality, energy and general bad-assery than starving yourself of both the food and sleep you so desperately need.

So you’re saying there’s a chance?
If you cannot sleep, and you cannot directly link your sleeplessness to something you can immediately handle, ask yourself if you could eat. Specifically, ask yourself if you could go for a personally tasty, carb-y, salty, fatty snack. It just might be exactly what you need to suppress your distress so your body can REST, and be fast off to SLEEP!

Your Diet Can Be A Piece of Cake

Is this you (or at least “weekend you”)?


Is this You on a diet?

Girl Dislikes Vegetables

From my experience working with people to better their health through food, fitness, and lifestyle, I am probably pretty close, if not spot on.

Dieting, restricted eating, or what is clinically referred to as “restrained eating”, is inherently unpleasant. In the words of my wife, ex-figure competitor, “dieting SUCKS!” But is the distaste (pun intended) for restrained eating/dieting simply a matter of psychological shortcomings of weak willed individuals?

There has been A LOT of research demonstrating that restrained eaters, when exposed to “palatable”, or more appropriately, diet restricted foods, like pizza, ice cream, or meat, will overeat, especially relative to unrestrained eating, non-dieters. The most interesting research to me has shown that seeing, smelling, or just thinking about “palatable” foods, creates a much higher amount of salivation in restrained eaters vs unrestrained eaters. To appreciate the importance of this finding, let’s discuss digestion.

In simple terms, our digestive system breaks down food to deliver energy (macronutrients)and vitamins and minerals (micronutrients) to all of our cells. The better our digestion, the better we can access, produce, and use energy and micronutrients. Salivation is one of the first products of the digestive process called the cephalic phase.

From Biology for Dummies“The cephalic phase comprises those stimuli that originate from the head: sight, smell, taste, or thoughts of food, as well as emotional state. Stimuli that arouse digestion are relayed to the hypothalamus, which in turn initiates nerve impulses in the parasympathetic vagus nerve. These impulses innervate nerve networks of the gastrointestinal tract (enteric nervous system), which promote contraction of smooth muscle (which causes peristalsis) and secretion of gastric juice. Stimuli that repress digestion (emotions of fear or anxiety, for example) innervate sympathetic fibers that suppress muscle contraction and secretion.”

Looking at digestion, coupled with the unconscious, hyperarousal of salivation, indicates to me that state of arousal may not only influence how you digest your food, but  may reflect what foods are best for you. An increase in salivation is an increase in digestive function. It might just be one of your body’s way of saying, YES!

But what happens if you ignore your body’s communication in favor of your diet plan?

The most common finding is that restrained eaters (someone on a diet) will eventually overeat compared to unrestrained eaters. An example of this research is to observe dieters and non-dieters in grocery stores when they are exposed to food sampling. Dieters eat a lot more samples than non-dieters.

One of my favorite studies looked at the amount of ice cream eaten by dieters (restrained eaters) vs non-dieters (unrestrained eaters). Both factions were split into 3 groups. One group had to drink 1 milkshake, the next had to drink 2 milkshakes, the third received no milkshake. After the milkshake was finished, all 3 groups were given a big tub of ice cream, and were given 10 minutes to eat as desired. When the time was up, the researchers returned to collect the tub of ice cream and measure how much had been eaten.

In the unrestrained (non-dieters) group, the more milkshake you consumed, the less ice cream you later ate. Makes sense. They were full. But in the restrained eating (dieters) group, the trend was the exact opposite. Dieters who did not receive a milkshake didn’t eat the ice cream. The dieters who had 1 milkshake had some ice cream. But the dieters who had 2 milkshakes ate the most ice cream of them all (also the lower the subject’s self esteem, the more they ate).

According to research restrained, restricted eating is statistically the single best predictor of future weight gain. It’s also a surefire way to not only be over tempted and interested in “off limit” foods, but also nearly assures that you will binge on them at some point.

But what happens if all “my body wants” is junk food?

Stress (of any kind) can increase the body’s needs for more food (think energy and nutrients). In particular stress can lead the body to need more carbohydrate and fat. It’s probably no coincidence that’s the primary ingredients of most “junk” food.

Additionally, during distress digestion becomes more inhibited. This drives the body to seek more easily digestible foods. “Processed” foods are, by their nature, quite digestible.

In other words, if your body is really only interested in “junk” food, at that time, you probably need it. If you’ll eat what works with your body, you can use it to address the stress in your life which will lead to better eating and health.

Anecdotally, I have been more restrained in my eating than most you will ever meet. I have experienced incredible distress because of that restraint. So when I first began to eat unrestrained my “junk food” appetite was insatiable. I ate nothing but bread (all things gluten), fast food, ice cream, chocolate, meat, and gallons of gatorade.

I was psychologically challenged. But I was physically very energized (and relieved)! And after just a few days, I became neutral to food for the first time in years! I was finally able to eat (and live) without struggling.

Today, even with an open and stocked cupboard of refined and processed foods, I find myself usually more interested in the foods that people generally consider to be “healthy” (Parents, same is true for my kids). And when I feel in need of the health “restricted” foods, I no longer overeat, binge, stuff, or sicken myself with them (or my thoughts on what I just ate). In fact, when I need them, processed foods have become a very healthy part of my diet. But that’s just me.

Earlier I mentioned my wife, the figure competitor and chronic dieter. Well, she no longer diets. After years of disordered eating she’s abandoned the restricted and regimented ways of restrained eating. She feels better, looks better, and is stronger than most guys I know (me included)! With a monumental increase in “allowed foods” she is really healing her body and relationship with food. Do you know what kind of freedom and health that allows for in life?

My Wife and Kids...  Pretty Healthy Group of Unrestrained Eaters, huh?

(My Wife and Kids…Pretty Healthy Group of Unrestrained Eaters, huh?)

One of the main tenants of The Movement is to go with the body, not against it. What might happen if you go with your digestive action and bodily inspired food interests instead of disciplined restraint and dietary dogma?

You can’t struggle to be healthy. Those concepts are antithetical. Feeling better and functioning better are the essence of health, and I believe that any foods that allow for such positive outcomes are healthy.

It’s simple: pay attention to your body’s cues, and be willing to follow. For better digestion, better health, more energy, more productivity, more satisfaction (in all things), consider eating what satisfies your body, whatever that may be. Healthy eating can be a piece of cake!


I love to cook. For me, cooking is that cathartic, me-time, activity. I also love to share food with my family, friends, and children. Cooking is something that I have done for a long time. First, I cooked instinctually and not that well. Then I studied it, and practiced it, very systematically and analytically. Now, after years of more academic cooking, I am once again cooking much more instinctually, and sensitively. Cooking, the way I do now, makes me feel better than ever before, and I have many reasons I believe it does.

#1 – Economy of Money
Food is one of my family’s biggest expenses. But, cooking and preparing most of my food at home allows me, and my family, to eat really well, and save A LOT. Exploring more grocery options, comparing prices, a little bit of planning, and even using coupons (many stores have electronic versions, SO EASY) and I now save THOUSANDS of dollars on food, each year. Please note, that more grocers are doing a better job at offering more variety of food, of all kinds. Great food is no longer limited to over priced whole food stores. Shop around, you’ll probably be pleasantly surprised.

#2 – Economy of Time
It takes me 12 minutes to make 4, 1/3 lb,  hamburgers with a side of beans and broccoli (and it costs me approx. $7). And with left overs, I now have a whole meal or meals which require zero time before eating. Now, how long does it take you to get in your car, drive to the restaurant of choice, order, receive it, eat and get back home, all for just one, mediocre meal? (and can you get 4 burgers and sides for $7?) The more you cook for yourself, the more time you will learn to save with food. I guarantee!

#3 – Community
As I mentioned above, getting to share it with others, giving a neighbor a bag of homemade chocolate chip cookies, or a pot of warm soup on a tough day can be a great way to care for, and connect with, others. Would you like it if I showed up at your house, on a whim, with fresh baked pie?

Also, cooking with my wife and kids offers multiple opportunities for connectedness and learning. My 5 year old daughter made an entire soup from scratch recently and it was AWESOME! All from hanging out with us in the kitchen, and helping where she can.

#4 – Physiology
Connect You and Your Food. You’ll learn a lot about food and you, working with it. Cooking could be the best way to add variety to your diet. Experimenting with and adding new foods is a lot easier when you can exactly tailor your food and recipes to your preferences; saltier, sweeter, spicier, fattier, you name it.

And, anecdotally, of all the people and families I have worked with over the last decade, the healthier ones always ate more from home, REGARDLESS of exactly what they were eating.

My homemade Cream of Sweet Potato and Potato Soup with bacon

My homemade Cream of Sweet Potato and Potato Soup with bacon

But, there is, above all else, one great reason to cook…

I’ve experimented A LOT with my diet. Hands down, I have most definitely experimented with my diet more than anyone I know, and still do! Part of my experimentation is observation and notation. I’ve meticulously followed how each food I eat makes me feel and function. From organic, local, whole foods to processed, refined, and fast food, I have uncovered that how I feel physically and emotionally, what time of day I’m eating, what I have done with my body recently, and what I have going on in the near future, all affect what food will make me feel and function my best.

It should come as no surprise how much my dietary needs can vary from day to day, and even meal to meal. In just hours my body can switch from organic sweet potato hash with bacon grease to frozen french fries with coconut oil, or a vegetable omelet to an egg white english muffin sandwich, or a rare steak and orange juice, to a double hamburger, on white bread, with lemonade.

As the cook, I know everything that goes into what I eat. Home-cooking allowed me to exactly monitor all the fine details, explore alternative ingredients and processes to enhance the way I feel, and it’s made a big difference.  From organic and pastured to greatly refined and processed, I am finding there is a use for ALL FOODS. I no longer fear or obsess over food because I’ve found the necessary places for all of it in my diet. 

Have you ever had a food, or a dish, that was so good for you one day, and then not all, the next?.. Today’s medicine might just be tomorrow’s poison.

You have very particular biochemical needs, each one of you, and cooking your own food allows you to exactly know and use, qualitatively and quantitatively, precisely what you need to eat.

To all the health bros and bro-ettes,
I guess my question to you is…
Do You Even Cook?

Question Everything

question-everything-800x600It was just after THE SUMMIT. I had presented the seminal information which was to become BioMechanics 1,2, & 3 to THE MOVEMENT “friendlies.” Response was good. We finished and retired to our accommodations.

Adam and I and a former friend / business partner of ours were about to pull the trigger. We were going to send out a invitation to our professional peers. The conversation shifted:
“Is the marketing too strong? Is it going to turn people off?”

I replied,
“The goal is this: We want to attract everyone who is willing to question everything. We want to repel everyone who is not.”

Fast forward from THE SUMMIT a few years.
We’re at another table.
A slightly larger table.
I’m surrounded by students, by friends.

They’re all so different, incredibly different. But a common thread emerges. These are people who have shown, time and time again, how much they will question. Many of those who weren’t willing and weren’t able to question as much are no longer at the table.

I can’t say that THE MOVEMENT has attracted everyone who will question everything
but I’m a little more confident in saying
we have certainly repelled those who would not.

For those who are at the table, thank you for showing up.
You have made my life better.
You have made it a little easier for me to question more.
I hope I do the same for you.
Some day we’ll all find each other at a much larger table
with more kindred spirits.
Those kindred spirits will bring more questions
and hopefully more answers, too.

Perpetual Progress has already been uncovered.
And that was just the beginning…
Physique, Athletics, Pain Relief, Personal Chemistry, Psychology…
the entire interface of being human has been made easier, better.

What’s next? Who knows?
I’m so excited to know the answers we will get
to questions we already have.
But even more than that,
I’m excited the questions to come…
the things we will question,
the things that we aren’t even thinking to question now.

Hacker Mentality

hackerdesktopThe term, “Hacking,” has made it’s way into the zeitgeist. While it was formerly reserved for matters of computer science, “hacking” has now been co-opted and applied in multiple contexts (and sciences). Let’s look at a definition.

“(Life) Hacking refers to any productivity trick, shortcut, skill, or novelty method to increase productivity and efficiency, in all walks of life; in other words, anything that solves an everyday problem of a person in a clever or non-obvious way.”

Tim Ferris (the other Faires, to me) is likely responsible for the sudden ascension of this term into our everyday life. Through his own personal experimentation, blog, and three books, he has demonstrated short cuts in so many areas including cooking, dancing, language, and fitness.

Fitness?  Oh, yes.  Hacking has definitely made its way into fitness. Perhaps you’ve heard or seen some of these “hacks:”
-hack your deadlift
-hack your workout
-hack your diet
-hack your fascia
-hacking your brain
-hack your nervous system
-hack your life

Why are we hacking so much?
What is so wrong with our exercises, our workouts, our diets, our bodies, and our lives?
We believe we should be able to do more than we’re able to do.
These hacks are positioned to the answer to this dissatisfaction.
But what if these “answers” are in response to the wrong question(s)?
What would the right question(s) be?

To of my favorite questions are,
“For what purpose?”
“At what cost?”
I think we’re pretty good at asking the first question,
the second…not so much.

Perhaps we’re not at good at asking the second question
because we’re not good at answering it.
Answering, “At what cost?” is something we excel at in THE MOVEMENT.

We excel at it because we
not only understand that everything makes us better or worse,
but we know how to measure it.
Those measurements guide us not only in the gym…
but in all aspects of our lives:
We live experimentally.

Before we undertake any endeavor,
we run the experiment:
Would __________ be good for me?

If the results of our experiment are positive,
an improvement in performance of that endeavor is assured.
In short, we get better at it…
and it makes us better.

We’ve trained ourselves to test what we do,
do what tests well,
and search for what to do
that will test well…
and have found no need to “hack” anything.

Perhaps the issue isn’t that anything about us needs to be “hacked,”
perhaps we just need to learn:
our interface better,
our software better,
ourselves better.
Better is hack-free and hack-proof.

“Healthy” Beliefs I Broke That Radically Improved My Health: Sugar

 Belief #3 – Sugar is toxic 

Are you considering a “sugar detox”?
Are you attempting to “go off sugar”?
Are you “addicted” to sugar?
Do you feel that sugar is “toxic”?

I cannot tell you how much of my nutritional education and work has been devoted to all of the above. And I cannot think of a personal health pursuit of mine that has not been rooted in attempting to eliminate “sugar” from my diet and life. Why is it so hard? Why do I ALWAYS fail with sugar?

The majority of my education, lower, higher, and continuing, have been rooted in answers. I was taught to listen, remember, recite, and replicate. I was inexplicably never taught to question. As a science major, I now find that baffling.

Over the last few years, I’ve spent almost the entirety of my educational, professional, and personal time, questioning.  I question EVERYTHING! And that’s precisely what brought me to an incredibly important nutritional question, “What is sugar?”

What is Sugar?
We’ve been conditioned to think of sugar as this…


When it’s MUCH MORE ACCURATE to think of it like this…


Paraphrasing the Royal Society of Chemistry, from just 3 elements, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, molecular compounds like monosaccharides (e.g. glucose) and disaccharides (e.g. sucrose) are formed. They are often called sugars.

The term “sugar” is most commonly used to refer to sucrose or table sugar. Technically, however, the term sugar refers to the simple, water-soluble molecules: monosaccharides and disaccharides.

canesugaris just 1 example

Among the monosaccharides, there are glucose, fructose, galactose, xylose, and ribose.

Sucrose, which is glucose + fructose, is a disaccharide.

Carbon (C); Water (H2O) Carbo - Hydrate

(C) Carbon, (H) Hydrogen, (O) Oxygen                         These 3 elements account for 98% of the human body by atomic percent

Where are edible “sugars” formed and found?
Elmhurst College Virtual Textbook clearly notes, “Sugar or more specifically sucrose is a carbohydrate that occurs naturally in every fruit and vegetable. It is the major product of photosynthesis, the process by which plants transform the sun’s energy into food.”

John E Lunn, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology states, “Sucrose (sugar) is one of the main products of photosynthesis and the most common transport sugar in plants.”

Glucose, Fructose, and Sucrose (sugars) are the carbohydrate molecules found in foods like melons, berries, beets, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, broccoli, even the beloved kale. Fruits and vegetables = sugar. Oh My!


Another dietary source of sugar is lactose, found in milk, which is a disaccharide of glucose and galactose. Also maltose, malt sugar, which is a disaccharide of two glucose units. The larger digestible carbohydrate molecules, polysaccharides, are found as starch. Starch is a long chain of glucose molecules, found in foods like wheat, rice and potatoes.

Monosaccharides and Disaccharides, the sugars, and polysaccharides, like starch, are carbohydrates.

carbs or sugars

Carbohydrates are one of our 3 macronutrients.

What is a macronutrient? 
According to the University of Illinois  McKinley Health Center, “Macronutrients are nutrients that provide calories or energy. Nutrients are substances needed for growth, metabolism, and for other body functions. Since “macro” means large, macronutrients are nutrients needed in large amounts. There are three macronutrients: Protein, Fat, and Carbohydrate.”

Table sugar is an isolated source of a macronutrient (carbohydrate).

Do I use (or Have I ever used) isolated sources of other macronutrients with positive results? 


This isolate (of fat) is considered to be very healthy.


And this isolate (of protein) is also considered to be very healthy.


And this isolate (of micronutrients) is considered to very healthy as well.


But this isolate (of carbohydrate) is considered a lethal drug!?!?!?!?!?

What role do sugars play in the human body?
The Royal Chemistry Society strictly states, “(The single sugar) Glucose is the most important carbohydrate fuel in human cells.”

Iowa State Human Sciences says, “The roles of carbohydrate in the body includes providing energy for working muscles, providing fuel for the central nervous system, enabling fat metabolism, and preventing protein from being used as energy. Carbohydrate is the preferred source of energy or fuel for muscle contraction and biologic work.”

New World Encyclopedia cites, “Glucose and its metabolites are also used to assist in the generation of the five-carbon (pentose) sugar ribose for the synthesis of nucleotides, the building blocks of the DNA… The addition of sugar chains may function to assist proteins in folding into their characteristic three-dimensional structure, to enhance the stability of proteins and membrane lipids, or to act as recognition sites for specific chemicals.”

What about Fructose?
According to Encyclopedia Britannica, “Phosphate derivatives of fructose (e.g., fructose-1-phosphate, fructose-1,6-diphosphate) are important in the metabolism of carbohydrates.”


Glycogen is the storage form of glucose (glucose is kind of a big deal). An inability to store glycogen is associated with diabetes. Glycogen is stored in either the muscles or liver. Fructose not only can greatly replenish hepatic glycogen (liver stores of glycogen), but can be highly stimulating of the synthesis and storage of glycogen. Glucose and Fructose are botanically found together, they chemically bond together, and work quite well together, biologically and physiologically.

Can I “go off” sugar?

All living cells contain sugar. Sugar provides energy for all cellular processes. Sugars provide building blocks for DNA, as well as, structural and functional support to fats, proteins, and each cell of the body. You aren’t addicted to it. You require it.

Have you ever heard, “dose determines the poison”? Toxic is not an element, it’s an amount. Everybody needs sugar because everyone’s body uses sugar. Some people may generally need less, while others may generally require more. And everyone’s needs will change from day to day, to some degree. But no one’s body functions without it.No entity is inherently poisonous, including sugar. Sugar is not toxic.

Detoxification (and elimination) are organismic, organ system, glandular, and cellular processes. Detoxification is one of the integral and on-going process of life…that requires sugar. You don’t detox from sugar. You detox with sugar.

Sweet Relief…
Table Sugar is simply and sweetly carbohydrate, isolated.  Food oil, protein powder, and multivitamins are all isolated nutrient sources. And along with a wide range of lesser processed and lesser refined macronutrient food sources, I use fat, protein, and multivitamin isolates all the time. In some form or fashion, I use each of them everyday. But each day my requirements are different.

I now guiltlessly and healthfully use sugar, too.  But like fat, protein, vitamins and minerals, I only use so much, because I only need so much. How much might you need? How might your needs change?

Sugar doesn’t have to make you feel bad, and you don’t have to feel bad about sugar.  Be willing to find out how much you need.

How might you know?  Be experimental.  If you’re hungry for sugar, try a bit of the kind you’re craving.

How might you measure your results?  Through your response.  After having a bit of carbohydrates, ask yourself, “do I feel better…or do I feel worse?”

Hopefully now that you understand a bit more about the science of carbohydrates, you can be experimental and not feel as bad as I once did…every time I had a carbohydrate.